engineerretired wrote:BuckyOHare wrote:Come on, what kind of method is that? Its nonsense.
All of numerology is nonsense.
engineerretired
And yet you took the time to post on this discussion. WHY if you weren't looking?
engineerretired wrote:BuckyOHare wrote:Come on, what kind of method is that? Its nonsense.
All of numerology is nonsense.
engineerretired
Typhon1 wrote:We post in an attempt to point out the fallacy of the claims to those who persist in believing this rubbish.
Typhon1 wrote:Well you would say that wouldn't you? Typical of the nut-cases who believe they are privy to some special, secret knowledge and therefore those of us who either question or reject it are labelled as not being in tune with the universe/the spiritual world or are left out. Mad as a box of frogs.
Typhon1 wrote:Well you would say that wouldn't you?
therefore those of us who either question or reject it are labelled as not being in tune with the universe/the spiritual world or are left out. Mad as a box of frogs.
mitchellhawk wrote:You said it was over 3 months since you saw the 11s again. Count from Jan 11 back 111 days, ok? I came up with Sept. 24, 2009,----> 9/24/2009----> 9+24+09= 44. 44/4=11. These periodic breaks in the sight of the number 11 may be a warning of things to come, now who sounds crazy? Of course I'm only saying 111 days back because it would not surprise me. That is why I document dates and times. FOR you it may have been 92 days or 99 days. just saying!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests