I HAVE COME ACROSS MUCH INFORMATION THAT VIRTUALLY PROVES HIGHER INTELLIGENCE for example humans have a body temperature lower than all other mammals, even monkeys, we have a body temperature of 36 point something degrees which is two degrees lower than all other mammals. This is a big difference, we also don't have hair on most of our bodies and we have an amazing ability to regain body temperature without damage to ourselves. Why do we have these differences to all other mammals? Especially when one of the main ingredients of being a mammal is that you have some way of keeping this hard earned heat in so you don't simply waste all the energy you burned up to warm yourself. Mammals need eighty percent more fuel to run them than reptiles because we heat our bodies rather than getting our heat from the sun or from laying on hot rocks in the morning. I have heard people come up with all sorts of lame reasons for why they don't have hair, all of them ridiculous but none the less I will list some of them here.
"We don't have hair because we are an intelligent creature and have evolved beyond hair."
"We don't have hair because we evolved near the equator and so therefore it was warm and we didn't need hair."
The first one is just hilarious and I won't bother to answer that except to say, "Is it more intelligent to have to made clothes and to constantly have to keep ourselves warm, when we could simply have a permanent covering?" The second one does not take into account all of the other mammals at the equator and in warm areas on Earth, if this made sense, then why don't they have no hair? I have heard silly stories like we have developed from dolphins and also other creatures don't have hair like pigs. True pigs mostly don't have hair but they have very think skin and a thick fat layer and we know this from eating them, same as whales and dolphins. We are simply the only mammals on Earth that just let our heat out and have no ability to keep it in, at all. Which is why we are the most ridiculous creatures on Earth wondering around in clothes. Somehow people fail to notice we are totally ridiculous and something is up with us?

Female humans are almost always on heat and sexually responsive, this is unique to humans, all other creatures have a distinct heat cycle. We are apparently just like chimpanzees but the fact is as close as we are, we are also very different, they for example they have 48 chromosomes and we have 46 and yet we are asked to believe we are just like them. Really when we have two less chromosomes!!! If you look at human chromosomes, it is apparently obvious that humans have been genetically altered as we do have almost the same chromosome information as chimpanzees and all other primates, it is simply that two of our chromosomes have been joined together and made into long strands and this appears to anyone who knows what they are looking for to be a case of them being joined together for some purpose. So the information is basically the same as for other primates who have 48 chromosomes, it is just that two of ours have been fused. All of this information is available and yet somehow totally buried, people in general do not know this information. If they did they may start to really question if there really is no God or higher intelligence? Our own bodies smack of that very reality. Human females who are rhesus negative, reject their own babies in the womb, if they happen to be rhesus positive and this negative blood also has no earthly origins. Here again is prove positive we are not from here or not entirely from here, apparently only hybrids will reject their own babies in the womb and this again is prove we are not a natural creature.

The moon is perfectly positioned to hold the tilt of the earth perfectly, to allow live on Earth, without it there would be no life on Earth and the moon does not rotate, it should if it was a natural satellite but it does not. It is also held in an orbit which it would not naturally find by itself. I talked about this to someone who is obviously an idiot and he said
"Well that is just the miracle of life on Earth"
I said
"No, that is someones intervention, how can you possibly think that is an accident rather than that it is deliberate, the chances of that happening naturally are almost zero and yet you choose to believe that, rather then the obvious which is life on Earth has been set up by a higher intelligence."

We also have gone against natural evolution, if there even is such a thing. If we were to work with natural evolution woman would come on heat in the summer and have our babies in late spring when they would have the best chance of survival and we would not be on heat all the time. We also would have grown hair which at one stage we did have because we get goose bumps which shows at some stage we had hair which we were able to make stand up and keep us warm. So we have in fact de evolved. Also humans have become very weak compared to previous humans and our bones are five times thinner than they were which means we are much lighter and weaker than we were because thicker heaver bones require much denser and stronger muscles and if we still had these muscles, they would in fact snap our bones now. We are five times weaker than chimpanzees, five times!!!

So is it really possible this is all some strange accident or is it we are a very special creature, placed on this Earth and nurtured along for a purpose and that purpose is being hidden from us, is that purpose about to come to light?

Awesome insight! I've studied biology in college, and you are absolutely right. A higher intelligence, that did create us, though is GOD, to me. Whoever made us is our creator-therefore GOD. Even earthworms have hearts, and complex filtration in their tiny kidneys. Very very complex, is our life on earth. No accident, great engineering. We also self heal- a preplanned effect. For example, if you drink too much cola, your body is dangerously acidic, the bones donate calcium to circulate in the bloodstream and buffer the ph of blood to a survivable level.

While researching the moon, I came across this information.....

MOON ORBIT IS WRONG! RISES FLAT @ 120 DEGREES & 52 MN.

Posted By: CliffMickelson <Send E-Mail>
Date: Saturday, 8-May-2004 14:25:03

Well, folks, This situation is getting hard to be glib about. What I witnessed last night was very wrong. Read on and you will see that there is something serious going on here.

CliffMickelson

***

Greetings, Cliff

I Watched the moon come up last night. I used "clock" positions about 8:30p.m. and it was pretty near a 7:00 positon on the clock. Got up about 2:30, again looked at the moon, it had only reached the approximate of 1:00am on the "clock" ...? Something is wrong here! Wonder if the earth is slowing down in her rotations? If so, this might explain the "shifting of the N. Pole" and slowly slipping out of "orbit"..
vkd

***

Greetings VKD!

YES! I saw EXACTLY the same thing. It took forever for the moon to move.

The Transit of the moon was, (according to the US Navy chart, at 3:30 AM. Yet, the moon had barely moved a quarter of the way across the sky by 3:30 AM, much less passed it's meridian!

Not only that, but it is in a very odd trajectory. It is moving up from extremely low on the Southeastern horizon and moving to the West, north west at a skewed angle.

This flattened trajectory was even more pronounced last night than ever before. You are right. Everyone needs to sit up and pay attention to this!

SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG HERE!

Also:

Last night's moon was late again as usual

Here are the numbers for my latitude and longitude:

According to the US Navy Chart Moon rise was due at 12:41 AM May 8, 2004.

However, the moon did not rise until 1:33 AM.

That's a difference of 52 min. compared to 47 the day before and 43 the day before that. There is a common ratio here of a five min. increase each time.

THAT IS A HUGE DIFFERENCE IN ASTRONOMICAL TERMS!

Now, for the kicker. Not only did Mr. Loony Moony rise late, but once again he moved 4 degrees farther west at the point of rising! Point of rising was at 124 degrees east, southeast off of magnetic north.

Think about that for a moment! That is only 56 degrees away from DUE south!

Why is the moon rising at this latitude only 56 degrees away from due south with less than 6 weeks to go before the summer solstice? By now, that sucker should have been transiting high in the sky. Since the moon is supposed to be in a more or less equatorial orbit, that means that once the northern hemisphere begins to tilt away from the sun, the moon will disappear from view all together in no time at all.

Here's an off the wall thought!

You don't suppose someone knows something we don't, and is moving the moon into a safe orbit?

Either that, or the Earth has developed a very pronounced wobble.

One thing is for sure. This "ain't" normal!

I have a bad feeling about this. I have never seen the moon in such a flat and angled trajectory.

I may have to buy some futures on Green Cheese!

-CliffMickelson

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=48521

I really only need two things to explain that long, yet partially interesting post (And several additions). First, the human body most likely has so many defects because we have developed technology, and have not used several evolutionary traits, so we shall only become worse and worse at such tasks that are made easy by our technology until evolution decides to dump them completely. You may say that makes no sense, and if it weren't for this example, I'd agree. My left eye doesn't work as well as my right. Why is this? Because in my early life, I used my right eye more than my left, so my left eye got weaker due to a lack of use. I even had to wear an eye patch for a while to correct it. It's Science, my friend. Second, I can sum up the rest with two simple sentences. This system is most likely not the way it is so we can survive. More likely, we survive because the system is the way it is. By this I mean that it's more likely that we are in existence because the conditions are right, and not because of some sort of Greater Being specifically making the situation as it is. However, I will not deny the possibility of a Higher Power in general. But at least yours is one of the more plausible theories on this forum. Mostly because you don't pull any Bible crap. Sorry for that, Christians.

Our world is so amazing! That we have to think there must be a God Creator!

Our Enigmatic Moon
Could our Moon be Artificial and Hollow?
2006 01 05

By N. Huntley, Ph.D. | zephnet.com

Let us outline some of the extraordinary anomalies and mysteries surrounding this puzzle. Clearly not all data will be equally reliable but the abundance of interrelated information nevertheless gives an overall picture which can be determined with some certainty. The first academic enigma must surely be that the Moon is apparently in its wrong orbit for its size. However, this would presumably be based on its assumed density. Technical reports claim a density of 3.3 for the Moon compared with 5.5 for Earth. Astronomy data indicates that the internal regions of the Moon are less dense than the outer, giving rise to the inevitable but outrageous speculation that it could be hollow. The eminent scientist Carl Sagan, a typical sceptic, made the statement, 'A natural satellite cannot be a hollow ob-ject'. But meaning here that if it is hollow, it is not a natural satellite---and therefore artificial.

Possibly the strongest evidence for it to be a 'hollow ob-ject' comes from the fact that when meteors strike the Moon, the latter rings like a bell. More specifically when the Apollo crew in November 20, 1969 released the lunar module, after returning to the orbiter, the module impact with the Moon caused their seismic equipment to register a continuous reverberation like a bell for more than an hour. The same effect occurred with Apollo 13's third stage which caused the Moon to ring for over three hours. So what's going on with the Moon?

Two Soviet scientists, Vasin and Shcherbokov, have spent much of their careers examining the facts compiled on lunar phenomena. Their conclusion is that the Moon is artificial, possibly a hollowed-out planet, and that it was steered from some distant region of the galaxy into a circular orbit around our planet (hence the extraordinary mystery of rock and Moon-dust age variations). They claim that intellectual life has existed in the Moon for eons.

It has been found that asteroids and meteors not only create shallow craters on the Moon's surface but produce a convex floor to the crater instead of concave as expected, supporting the idea of a rigid shell. Countless other pieces of evidence from astronomers and NASA scientists began to reveal that some 2-3 miles down there appear to be dense layers of metal---which would explain why the craters were convex. But the most astonishing conclusion is that the only theory which can completely explain all the anomalies is that the Moon is hollow with a shell about 20 miles thick---mostly metal. Note that mascons (higher concentrations of mass) found in the marias cause fluctuations in gravity and have never been satisfactorily explained.

Moreover, these structural anomalies were supported by two publications, one Time Magazine, which unwittingly revealed the gravity value of the Moon relative to Earth by publishing the distance from Earth to Moon of the null point between them, indicating a gravitational force some 60 -70 % of Earth. Furthermore, some people noticed the feeble plumage of the rocket exhaust as the module rose from the Moon's surface---explained away by NASA as due to the vacuum. But what about some of the telltale and suspicious features observed during the first Armstrong and Aldrin Moon landing. The American flag was seen briefly to wave in ... a breeze? But we are told there is no air on the Moon. The flag was then starched. Also we saw dust kicked up by the astronauts clearly drifting in . . . what? Dust particles do not drift in vacuum---they cling together. And what about the feeble leaps of the astronauts off the Moon's surface---were their spacesuits and backpacks really so heavy? The Moon is supposed to be about one-sixth the gravity of Earth.

Furthermore, a study of rock samples reveal an age of 5.3 billion years, and that not only is the Moon older than the Earth, estimated to be about 4.6 billion years, but that it is older than the solar system (and by theoretical standards as old as the universe).

Other viewers observed the extreme difficulty astronauts had when drilling down a few inches into the Moon's marias and that when the drill bit was pulled out, metal shavings were visible. Rocks were found to contain brass, mica, titanium, and elements uranium 236 and Neptunium 237 not previously found in nature.

The results of NASA photographs of the lunar surface, indicating several large pyramid structures, strange rifts in the surface with entrances, massive girders, machinery and some 1000 kilometre blocks of metal, tears in the surface, revealing massive interior 'plumbing', huge crosses a mile long, and enormous excavating equipment. Professional astronomers have gradually been discouraged from investigating these observations, referred to as Transient Lunar Phenomena, and all such Fortean observations are now only of interest to the amateur.

Our satellite has long since been established as being extremely dry but this information has been contradicted by the appearance of clouds on the surface. On one occasion a cloud of water vapour appeared covering more than 100 square miles. And it has been reported that strange clouds appear at lightning speed. The capture theory that the Moon was pulled into its orbit by the Earth was once favoured but the circular orbit of the Moon invalidated it. As already mentioned the Moon is the wrong size and in the wrong orbit. It is too big and too far out. It does not rotate relative to Earth; the same side always faces the Earth. And what about the amazing 'coincidence' of the eclipse phenomenon. The position and size of the Moon is precisely that necessary to eclipse the Sun's disc.

Scientific experts, including NASA investigators believe that the Moon is hollow---it is the only explanation. The velocity of sound has been found to increase with depth and at 40 miles it is too fast for the speed of propagation through rock substance. 'Spaceship Moon' is the brainchild of the two Soviet researchers but many others agree with the theory, including NASA scientists at JPL and an Oxford University physicist. The capture theory is now back in favour but with a significant adjustment that the Moon was steered into orbit.

It might be worth a comment on the recent 'conspiracy theory' that astronauts never actually went to the Moon. DVDs and television programmes have proffered that, in particular, photographs allegedly taken on the Moon were faked. In fact one can see clearly in the photographs that the shadows of ob-jects on the Moon were not parallel as they would be if the shadows were cast by the Sun, rather than by studio lighting. Further evidence has been given. But we may know from earlier suspicions that NASA has a propensity for faking scenes---for example, the view of the interior of the shuttle faking an outer-space mission when actually on the ground. Thus the conclusion, and personal opinion of the author, is that both scenarios are correct: astronauts did land on the Moon, and NASA has produced faked photographs.

http://www.redicecreations.com/specialreports/2006/01jan/moon.html

I must say, I do not think there is a God creator of this world. I believe the Universe is "God himself" and intelligence is there as part of it, lets say, like radio waves. I think one day in the future this is going to be proven with machines and artificial intelligence. We know too little about true and reality. Just think how amazingly close we are to chimps and animals in general; if we the humans are so different, why do we and animals have so much in common, like blood, hands, legs skeletons, eyes (two most of the time) or one mouth one anus, genitals, fingers, nails, hair, teeth and a million organs alike that will classify all of as, animals and humans just as terrestrials. For extraterrestrials or other advanced intelligence I think we are provably just the same. "Terrestrial animals" or better said terrestrial life in evolution! Think about!

Just a thought: Evolution is God's Hands, and the seven days of Creation have not beginning nor end. Words are the apple we ate from the serpent, and Lucifer?
Lucidity, more intelligence. "Know the true and you will be God" ( we are already, as it is any thing and every thing)

The 3 Great Pyramids were built over 15000 years ago... before the previous Ice Age. They are massive archaeological accomplishments. None of the more recent pyramids were designed nearly as well as the three oldest. The Sphinx is just as old if not older... definitely pre-iceage. In those times God was the Sun and the Sun was God. Find out where the Bible came from... it's text stem back to before 2000 BCE. Archaeologists have found small scrolls of Hebrew Bible scripture in the ground at sites of Sha'arayim (David's Kingdom) for example. The Bible is an interesting story, but is very misleading and translated poorly through time. I also remember that these people thought the world was flat and the earth was the center of the universe. A lot of the bible is stolen from Egyptian belief since the Jews were the Egyptian slaves for so long, their morals sorta entwined, but their god was to lead them to freedom and hope. They were the first religion to have only 1 god, whereas all religions known before this worshiped multiple gods. These gods were astrological, since they didn't have the technology to know that those lights in the sky.. yeah those or massive balls of burning hydrogen gas millions of light years away. They thought they were mystical gods since they saw them all night every night. They were amused with the stars and tracked their movement through the sky and discovered the movement of the seasons. I'd trust Science over an old book of myths and prophecies any day. Creationism seems to be the story tellers version of the beginning of time... unlike the destructively powerful true beginning. Also, don't forget about the possibility that DNA could have came on a comet or meteor and landed on our planet then multiplying and becoming cells and eventually worms and fish, etc... and if that's how it was then their were probably multiple different forms those cells took and evolved into so many different creatures. Some fish spawn on shore... due to adaptation, why not use your fins as legs, and eventually your genetic code will give you what you need. Penguins for example. Anyway, I'm going on and on... just do some "out of Bible" research about the damn thing and find out the truth about it... Then find the stars to correlate! It's great fun! But, I know that's not going to stop you from having "faith". I prefer knowledge over "faith" any day.

I don't understand why there has to be a clear black and white distinction between believing in a higher power and evolution. I used to believe like you that because humans appear to be very weak that natural selection was unlikely. Then I went to college and actually learned what natural selection is, natural selection does not create perfect organisms, far from it, natural selection is all about compromises.

Our brain encephilization can be directly correlated to the shrinkage of our intestines, both intestine tissue and brain tissue are energetically expensive to develop and maintain, thus there has to be a give and take between the two, we gained intelligence but restricted our diet to high quality easy to digest food. The human body is full of examples of this give and take and to say that natural selection doesn't work because we do not have a good body design is also very untrue, we actually unique and useful structure.

You say that humans have "devolved' when we lost our hair, firstly there is no such thing as devolving, any change in the allele frequency in an population is evolution, and secondly, losing our hair was a very smart evolutionary move, it allowed us to take full advantage of our ability to sweat which is a much more productive way to cool down then panting, and being that we evolved in Africa, one of the hottest places on earth, we had a huge advantage over fur-bound panting quadrapeds. Also what you said about women not going into heat is also faulty logic, it would be in a womens best interest to not show any signs of ovulation the way our closest primate relatives do. Human babies are born prematurely because otherwise their big-brained head would never fit through our narrow birth canals, this being such human babies require constant attention and care. A women does not want to be mated with and then dumped with the sole responsibility of caring for a baby on her own, it is in her best interest to get the male to hang around for as long as possible, which the male is forced to do when he cannot tell if she is fertile, not having a mating season is a female human reproductive strategy that has been largely successful, as can be seen by the high frequency of monogamy and child rearing fathers in human couples.

You also compare chimpanzees with humans, humans are not weak as you say but are actually pound for pound stronger than a horse, chimps do not magically stronger muscles than humans, they have more leverage with there stronger limbs,it is simple physics, this is why a tall man has an advantage over a short man, even if the shorter man is more muscular. By saying that humans are worse off then chimps because we are not as strong as them also implies that we would be better off if we were more like them, which is not true, humans unique bipedalism is much much more energetically efficient than a chimpanzees form of locomotion, in fact we are almost as efficient as true quadrapeds, but with the added advantage of having grasping hands, which I don't think I need to explain why they are advantageous.

And last but not least, natural selection is also strongly impacted by sexual selection, at the end of the day it doesn't matter how big and scary you are, it's how many copies of your genes you leave behind. Some things are strongly selected for even if they are not advantageous in a survival of the fittest sense, i.E. A peacocks tail. It is very likely that we are just products of our own sexual preferences. I believe in god, but I also believe in science, they are not mutually exclusive!!!