Hello all,
I have been watching some serious TV programmes recently, ones based in science, life and the world in general. Once again in these programmes the argument of creation versus evolution rears it's head. As you are aware my belief leans towards evolution and the theory and science that supports it. It appears this argument will never go away as the religious sector will never accept it and equally the non religious will defend their view vigorously.
What can I say that you have'nt already read or knew yourselves. What should you believe, Darwin or Genesis. I take "believe" to mean something close, to accept without questioning or accept as an assumption, in that case one should believe neither Darwin or Genesis and look at the logic behind the position and the evidence for or against it.
What is the logic for the Judeo-christian creation myth being true, is there more reason for that particular creation myth to be true than say, the Hindu creation myth, the bhuddist, or the creation myths of the American indians. You could find literally hundreds of creation myths, just because you have been raised in the tradition of one it doesnt give that particular priority above the others. One of the many problems with what is termed the creationist position is that it takes the Judeo-Christian myth as the truth, neglecting all others. Intelligent design, (which is thinly veiled creationism) neglects many of the myths that have a god which creates the world fairly spontaneously and then sits back and lets it run, like Bhuddism or hinduism if I understand it correctly.
So how do you choose. To me there is no choice. I believe in evolution as the evidence is all around us, it is supported by scientific study and fact. There are many people trashing Darwinism, mostly religious, lets look at the basic logic of the evolutionary thesis.
It has been established that the basis for cellular functioning and structures in both individual cells and in organisms is their DNA. DNA is the master code so to speak, of course there's other stuff, RNA, various cellular structures, mitochondria... but DNA is the necessary basis. When DNA is changed the organism changes, these changes can help species adapt to an ever changing environment, these changing characteristics are then passed on to offspring, which evolve as a more highly developed version of the same species. As we know evolution is a very random process, but that is the beauty of the randomness, inherant changes allow for adaptability, to run faster, fly higher, grow hair to stay warmer or a longer beak to get into a seedpod. Evolution allows species to cope better with the environment it finds itself in, it is these inherant changes which will ultimately progress the human race, unless of course you believe we have reached the pinnacle of our evolution.
There is plenty of evidence of evolution. libraries and museums are full of it, laboratories are busy studying evolution in bacteria, in flies and other things that grow and multiply fast, we see it happening. I am not going to give references, there are truckloads of evidences, books, museums, the internet. The choices people make are individual, I am not going to try and change your belief, I am merely pointing you towards the evidence.
There are many flaws in the creation argument but in evolution where's the flaw...? you find it, I can't .
Mr Darwin.



